📖 Business
Three Horizons Model
Kim draws on Geoffrey Moore's Three Horizons framework to explain how organizations must simultaneously manage three distinct time horizons of investment. Horizon 1 is the core legacy business that generates current revenue. Horizon 2 is adjacent growth — extensions of the core business into new markets, channels, or customer segments. Horizon 3 is true innovation and experimentation — exploratory bets that may become the next Horizon 1. The critical problem Kim illustrates is that bureaucratic organizations systematically starve Horizon 3 because it does not fit existing processes, metrics, or risk tolerances. Horizon 1 gets all the resources because it produces measurable revenue today. Horizon 3 gets killed by committees that demand business cases and ROI projections for fundamentally uncertain experiments. The result is organizations that optimize their present while destroying their future.
2
Minutes
2
Concepts
+45
XP
1
How It Works
- Horizon 1: Core Business — The established products, customers, and operations that generate today's revenue. H1 investments are about optimization, efficiency, and incremental improvement. They are low-risk, high-certainty, and easy to justify with traditional business cases. The danger is over-investing in H1 at the expense of H2 and H3 — milking the cash cow while the market shifts underneath you.
- Horizon 2: Adjacent Growth — Extensions of the core into new markets, customer segments, or product lines. H2 investments carry moderate risk and can be evaluated with modified versions of traditional metrics. Examples: expanding a retail business into e-commerce, or adding a new product tier for a different market segment. H2 is where most "innovation" programs actually operate.
- Horizon 3: Disruptive Innovation — Exploratory bets on fundamentally new capabilities, markets, or business models. H3 investments are high-uncertainty: most will fail, but the few that succeed can become the next H1. H3 requires a different management approach: small bets, rapid iteration, tolerance for failure, and metrics based on learning velocity rather than revenue. Kim shows Parts Unlimited's H3 efforts (digital transformation experiments) being killed by H1 governance processes.
- Bureaucracy Kills H3 — The central tension in Kim's narrative. Horizon 3 experiments cannot survive the same approval processes, business case requirements, and risk reviews that govern Horizon 1 operations. When H3 initiatives must justify themselves using H1 metrics (ROI, revenue projections, market sizing), they always lose the budget battle because their returns are uncertain by definition. Organizations must create protected space for H3 with different governance.
- Portfolio Balance — Kim and Moore argue for deliberate portfolio management across all three horizons. A healthy organization might allocate 70% to H1, 20% to H2, and 10% to H3 — but the exact split depends on industry dynamics, competitive pressure, and strategic position. The key is making the allocation explicit and defending H3's share against H1's gravitational pull.